February 24, 2026 · 1 min read·
Artificial IntelligenceResponsible TechDigital PrivacyTechnology EthicsAI Engineering

Good intentions don’t cancel out bad implementation

A phone running an AI age check: scan your face, estimated age 18+, 61% sure
Illustrated and 3D modelled by me

I don’t write posts often. I usually observe quietly.
But given where the world, technology, and AI are headed, staying silent no longer feels responsible.

To be clear upfront:
I am not anti-AI. I study AI. I work with it. I believe in its potential.

What I am concerned about is how irresponsibly it’s being deployed and consumed.

AI systems are advancing faster than society’s ability to understand, regulate, or use them wisely. We are now at a point where distinguishing between human and AI-generated content is genuinely difficult. That alone dramatically increases the risk of misinformation, manipulation, and misplaced trust.

More worrying is where we are choosing to offload responsibility.
AI was meant to assist human judgment, not quietly replace it in areas where accountability, context, and ethics still matter deeply.

As an Indian, this concern feels more immediate.

We are a highly connected country with:

  • low general digital and data-security literacy,
  • increasing dependence on auto-generated code and tools,
  • and a growing history of large-scale data leaks and scams.
Three cards, one per point: a scam text asking for a KYC update and an OTP; auto-generated code shipped with a default database password; a data-leak alert listing a phone number, ID number and city

In that context, solutions like AI-based age verification for children (requiring government IDs or facial analysis) are not just weak, they’re careless. These systems are already spoofable, encourage excessive data collection, and shift responsibility away from parents and platforms onto technology that cannot be trusted with it.

An AI age check in three steps: upload a government ID, which now sits on someone else's server; scan your face, which a printed photo can pass; and "verified 18+" at 61% model confidence

Good intentions don’t cancel out bad implementation.

Another uncomfortable truth we need to accept:
A product does not become good or safe simply because it is made in India.

I deeply respect Indian startups and want them to compete globally. But technical flaws, over-promising, and security gaps don’t disappear under national pride. A bad product is a bad product, regardless of where it’s built.

Technology should be evaluated on usability, safety, and real-world impact, not sentiment.

We should be developers who build with awareness, question blind adoption, and value human judgment as much as innovation.

AI will shape the future, that’s inevitable.
Whether it improves society or weakens it depends entirely on how responsibly we choose to use it today.

Start
something.

Based in India · IST (UTC+5:30) · Works remotely

Or write it here:

Which describes you?

Goes straight to my inbox, with the page you came from.

Your draft stays on this device until you send it. Until then I only see rough labels, like a budget range or a job search. Privacy

Prefer email? hello@smithmankar.co.in · LinkedIn